Understanding True Deal Valuations: Beyond the Headline Numbers

In partnership with

Top investors are buying this “unlisted” stock

When the team that co-founded Zillow and grew it into a $16B real estate leader starts a new company, investors notice. That’s why top firms like SoftBank invested in Pacaso.

Disrupting the real estate industry once again, Pacaso’s streamlined platform offers co-ownership of premier properties – revamping a $1.3T market.

By handing keys to 2,000+ happy homeowners, Pacaso has already made $110m+ in gross profits.

Now, after 41% gross profit growth last year, they recently reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO. But the real opportunity is now, at the unlisted stage.

Until May 29, you can join Pacaso as an investor for just $2.80/share.

Invest before the window closes.

_{This is a paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals. Under Regulation A+, a company has the ability to change its share price by up to 20%, without requalifying the offering with the SEC.}

When evaluating small business acquisitions, the headline purchase multiple often tells only part of the story. To truly understand deal economics, we need to examine attachment and detachment points across the capital structure.

Key Concepts:

• Attachment Point: The valuation threshold where a security holder begins recovering their investment

• Detachment Point: The valuation where a security holder has fully recovered their principal

These concepts matter because even straightforward acquisition deals typically involve four distinct securities with different priority levels:

1. SBA Debt (Senior-most position)

2. Seller Financing

3. Investor Preferred Equity

4. Common Equity (Junior-most position)

Deal Analysis: The 3x EBITDA Myth

Let's examine a typical self-funded acquisition:

Initial Setup:

• Target EBITDA: $500,000

• Purchase Multiple: 3.0x ($1.5M)

• Sounds attractive, right?

Total Project Costs:

• Base purchase price: $1,500,000

• Working capital requirement: $150,000

• SBA guarantee fees: $30,000

• Transaction costs: $45,000

• Sales tax and other fees: $75,000

• Total project cost: $1,800,000

Effective multiple: 3.6x EBITDA (20% higher than headline)

Financing Structure:

• SBA loan: 82% ($1,476,000)

• Seller note: 8% ($150,000)

• Total equity: 10% ($178,500)

  • Investor contribution: $150,000

  • Searcher contribution: $28,500

The Day-After Reality Check

Here's where the math gets sobering. If you attempted to sell the business immediately after closing:

Enterprise Value: $1,500,000 (3.0x original EBITDA) Less: SBA loan balance, seller note, and transaction costs Net equity value: Negative

This means all equity holders—both investors and the searcher—would lose their entire investment despite purchasing at the "attractive" 3x multiple.

Investor Economics: When Preferred Equity Actually Pays

Attachment Point: Investors begin recovering capital only after the business achieves a valuation of $1,656,500 (3.3x EBITDA)

Detachment Point: Full recovery occurs at $1,806,500 (3.6x EBITDA)

This means investor returns depend entirely on the business growing beyond its initial valuation—the preferred equity attachment point represents the true acquisition multiple from an investor's perspective.

Searcher Economics: The Steepest Mountain to Climb

As the common equity holder, the searcher faces even higher hurdles:

Attachment Point: $1,806,500 (after preferred equity is fully paid)

Detachment Point: $1,840,758 (3.7x EBITDA)

To simply break even on their $28,500 investment, the searcher needs the business to reach nearly 3.7x its original EBITDA—requiring EBITDA growth from $500,000 to approximately $615,000.

The Compounding Effect of Price Increases

This analysis reveals why valuation discipline matters exponentially. Consider the impact of paying an additional 0.5x multiple:

Revised scenario at 3.5x purchase multiple:

• Searcher break-even point: Over 4.0x EBITDA

• Required EBITDA growth: $500,000 to $650,000+

That "small" 0.5x concession to the seller fundamentally changes the investment thesis, requiring substantially more operational improvement to generate returns.

Strategic Implications

Understanding these dynamics helps explain several common acquisition outcomes:

1. Why growth is non-negotiable: Unlike financial engineering opportunities in larger deals, small business acquisitions depend almost entirely on operational improvements

2. Why valuation discipline matters: Each incremental multiple paid compounds the operational performance requirements

3. Why many acquisitions struggle: The day-one equity destruction means operators must drive significant improvement just to reach breakeven

The Bottom Line

Before making that final pricing decision, calculate your true attachment and detachment points. The headline multiple represents just the starting line—your actual investment returns depend on reaching valuation levels that may be 20-30% higher than the purchase price.

Understanding these mechanics doesn't mean avoiding deals with higher entry multiples, but it does mean entering them with realistic expectations about the operational performance required to generate attractive returns.

The math is unforgiving, but clarity around these dynamics enables better decision-making throughout the acquisition and operation process.

If you’re looking to join our community of paid members where we provide guidance into your acquisition then please feel free to find more information here.